Comments on: NJ Citizens For Assembly Unite To Take Back NJ With Common Sense Pledge

By: 2009 NJ Assembly Candidates Upbeat In Long Shots Districts | NJ Common Sense

Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:46:29 +0000

[...] in these heavily Democratic Party controlled and troubled districts need to look at the Citizens for Assembly candidates and their Common Sense Pledge. Tagged as: Barry Funt, Citizens for Assembly, Common [...]

By: Rush Holt 3 Lies About $787 Billion Stimulus | NJ Common Sense

Rush Holt 3 Lies About $787 Billion Stimulus | NJ Common Sense — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:47:09 +0000

[...] local speed trap at the start of 29 in Frenchtown disappeared. On my recent trip to Trenton for the Citizens for NJ Assembly announcement on September 30th I was surprised to see the speed trap again, perhaps funded from [...]

By: Christie Supporters Lambaste Weak Campaign Stategies | NJ Common Sense

Christie Supporters Lambaste Weak Campaign Stategies | NJ Common Sense — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:32:13 +0000

[...] Citizens for NJ Assembly candidates have school choice as one of the 10 points on their Common Sense Pledge. Many are [...]

By: “You wouldn’t keep the taxes down!” Dick Codey To John McKeon While Taking Bows For $1 Million to Roseland | NJ Common Sense

Sat, 10 Oct 2009 05:14:46 +0000

[...] Barry has adopted the Common Sense and is running as a Citizens for Assembly candidate. [...]

By: Tea Party Candidates Run For New Jersey State Assembly | NJ Common Sense

Tea Party Candidates Run For New Jersey State Assembly | NJ Common Sense — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:12:32 +0000

[...] The candidates have grouped together as the Citizens for Assembly. [...]

By: Morristown Tea Party Promotes School Choice Issue In 2009 New Jersey Elections | NJ Common Sense

Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:25:41 +0000

[...] Israel points to the opportunity for school choice in the 2009 New Jersey elections. Over 40 NJ Assembly candidates have joined together on bringing school choice to New Jersey. He introduced Barry Funt, the main organizer of the candidates, who later gave an unscheduled talk on the effort. [See related article "NJ Citizens For Assembly Unite To Take Back NJ With Common Sense Pledge"] [...]

By: Common Sense Pledge A Citizen Friendly Contract for NJ | NJ Common Sense

Common Sense Pledge A Citizen Friendly Contract for NJ | NJ Common Sense — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 11:04:46 +0000

[...] at the NJ State House on September 30, 2009, the Common Sense Pledge has the trappings of the 1994 Contract for America. Both were announced only a few weeks before the [...]

By: Rob Johnson

Rob Johnson — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:00:13 +0000

Israel – I believe Tea Maker’s issue re: taking votes away from Christie is that those who may be inclined to vote for an independent candidate for Assembly may also re-think their choice for Governor. But you are probably right in saying that the net impact will be minimal.

Tea Maker – can you provide any references regarding your issues with the Morristown Tea Party? I’ve looked at their website and don’t see anything regarding Christie. I do share your concern that the tea party movement may be headed towards supporting “independent” candidates, which is a losing proposition.

By: Israel Teitelbaum

Israel Teitelbaum — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 01:07:50 +0000

Tea Maker sees a problem where none exists. Why would 40 citizen Assembly candidates take away votes from Christie? They aren’t running against him. On the contrary, they are highlighting many of the issues he is touting, such as school choice and clean government. I suspect that Tea Maker is a Corzine plant. He gives himself away when he says, “I believe this Citizens for Assembly like the Daggart candidacy is really an attempt by Democrats who infiltrated this NJ Tea Party movement to pull enough votes away from Christi and GOP candidates to insure another Democrat victory.” Having been closely involved in the grass roots movement which resulted in Citizens for Assembly, please be assured that nothing can be further from the truth. These are dedicated and couragious individuals who seek to take back government for the people.

By: Tea Maker

Tea Maker — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:26:50 +0000

Should The Federal System of Government be Changed to A Parliamentary System.

The Federal System was created at a time when the nation was 90 percent farmers. This system of government has shown that it is incapable of representing the third largest nation in the world (300 million people) in a modern era. Our lives and the lives of prodigy are in peril by a Government that now despises and in fact hates the people sworn to protect. Volumes could be written describing the injustice our people suffer today by all agencies of this government. What to do?

Two Amendments to the US Constitution would correct much of the tyranny we now endure.

1. The Elimination of the US Senate. This body was intended to represent and protect the sovereignty of the individual states. These Senators should never have been elected. Since State governors change frequently, new governors would choose new Senators. This is why term limits were not build into the US Constitution. This is why we now have career Senators.

2. Require the US Supreme Court Judges to Run for Election. Most of the States already elect their judges including State Supreme Court Judges. These judges are no different than any of us other than their parents had the money to send them to the best law schools in the nation. The US Supreme Court Judges want to legislate from the bench so let them, but require that they run for office just like other legislators.

If changes like this are not made, this new tyranny we now face will destroy us. It could be that just like the USSR, our nation is already dead but we are too stupid to fall down.

Fair and Equal